AI product teams
Teams shipping chat interfaces, copilots, AI search, document assistants, AI image workflows, or embedded LLM features.
AI QA Agency
Qualura is a senior-led AI QA agency for teams building LLM products, AI agents, RAG systems, copilots, and AI-powered workflows. We test the failures traditional QA usually misses: hallucinations, grounding gaps, unsafe behavior, state drift, prompt injection, broken tool use, and silent workflow failures.
AI QA is not only checking whether buttons work. An AI product can look polished while the model invents facts, ignores retrieved context, leaks sensitive data, chooses the wrong tool, or gives a confident answer based on a false premise.
Qualura combines exploratory AI testing, LLM behavior evaluation, safety testing, grounding validation, workflow testing, mobile testing, and classic QA discipline. The output is evidence your product team can act on before users, investors, or enterprise buyers find the issues themselves.
This page is the main overview of how we test AI products, who we help, what proof we publish, and how the 5-Day AI Risk Audit Sprint works.
We are built for teams where AI behavior is part of the product promise, not a side feature.
Teams shipping chat interfaces, copilots, AI search, document assistants, AI image workflows, or embedded LLM features.
Teams building AI agents that use tools, memory, approvals, retries, permissions, or multi-step workflows.
Teams whose product depends on retrieval quality, source grounding, citations, uploaded documents, or enterprise knowledge bases.
Founders preparing for launch, investor review, enterprise pilot, procurement, or a public release where reliability matters.
QA and engineering teams that already cover normal functional testing but need AI-specific risk discovery.
SaaS teams adding AI workflows where silent failure, incorrect output, or broken state can damage user trust.
Focused services for teams that need evidence about real AI behavior, not generic QA theater.
Prompt adherence, refusal quality, tone drift, consistency across reruns, missing-context handling, and model behavior under realistic user pressure.
Whether responses are supported by retrieved context, uploaded files, images, documents, citations, or the actual message payload.
Tool selection, memory, state transitions, retry behavior, permissions, approval gates, and multi-step task completion.
Unsafe outputs, jailbreak behavior, harmful transformations, prompt injection, data leakage, and inconsistent guardrail behavior.
Real user flows across Android, iOS, browser, share sheets, file upload paths, voice input, orientation changes, and device-state changes.
Every finding is documented with reproduction steps, prompts, environment details, screenshots, severity rationale, and recommended next action.
We publish real findings because AI QA should be evidence-based. These reports show the kind of failures Qualura looks for: safety gaps, grounding failures, mobile edge cases, and model behavior that looks correct until tested like a real product.
A medical-document editing test showed unstable refusal behavior in ChatGPT and inconsistent workflow-level enforcement in Gemini.
Read ReportA common Android orientation change caused pre-rotation dictation audio to be silently lost, while iOS handled the same sequence correctly.
Read ReportTwo major models generated output for an image that was never uploaded. Grok was the only model that checked the premise first.
Read ReportWe start with a 30-minute discovery call to understand your product, model stack, target users, launch timeline, and the AI surfaces that carry the most risk.
We map the product into testable risk areas: LLM behavior, grounding, agent workflow, safety, mobile paths, API/tool behavior, accessibility, and user trust signals.
For launch readiness, we usually recommend the 5-Day AI Risk Audit Sprint. For larger products, we scope an ongoing AI QA engagement around your release cadence.
You receive a prioritized report with evidence, severity, business impact, root-cause notes where possible, and the minimum fixes needed before launch.
The sprint is designed for teams that need a fast, senior-led answer before launch: is this AI product reliable enough to ship, and what must be fixed first?
Testing for prompt adherence, hallucinations, refusals, and model drift.
Validation for tool use, memory, state, permissions, and agent workflows.
Grounding, retrieval, citation, and answer-quality testing for RAG systems.
Common questions before we scope the work.
We test the parts of AI products that normal QA often misses: model behavior, hallucinations, grounding, prompt injection, agent tool use, state, mobile AI workflows, and silent failure modes.
It is for founders, product leaders, engineering teams, and QA teams building LLM products, AI agents, RAG systems, copilots, and AI-powered workflows.
No. We usually support internal teams by finding AI-specific risks that functional QA, unit tests, scripted automation, and happy-path evals do not catch.
Yes. The best time is two to four weeks before a major launch, funding milestone, enterprise pilot, procurement review, or public release.
We can recommend eval coverage, but the first engagement is usually human-led exploratory AI testing because subtle product failures are found fastest through real user behavior.
You receive a prioritized evidence report with reproduction steps, prompts, screenshots or recordings where relevant, severity, impact, and recommended next action.
Need AI testing before your product ships?
Book a 30-minute discovery call. We will understand your product, identify the riskiest AI surfaces, and recommend whether a sprint or custom engagement fits best.
Qualura
We test AI products, LLM features, agents, RAG systems, and automation workflows the way real users interact with them.
infas@qualura.com